Sunday, February 20, 2011

so much

There's so much going on in my mind that I wish I had a pensieve like the one Dumbledore did and float in there ..but I don't wish to transcend through time - i don't care to skim through the translucent surfaces of past or future right now. Its here and now that's more interesting. :) I am sure all I say sounds so abstract and contextually challenging! But where to take this intense madness that I AM at times?! Does it have a shore? Sigh.

27 comments:

  1. But where to take this intense madness that I AM at times?! Does it have a shore? Sigh.

    ...no, it's a prisoner of its own "departure". :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. ...a passenger par excellence.

    nice blog, though. :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. ...how difficult to understand unfamiliar blood! Like it sought some kind of reckoning from you (from the reader)! And you feel the rush of your own blood seeking out to meet it, since the reckoning must be in blood - and you draw back in alarm. Creepy? Yes, perhaps, definitely perhaps - but then, perhaps not. :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. :) Thanks Anonymous.

    Creepy? Perhaps not - no, definitely not.. :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. ..."shrug" :)

    ...ragon mein daudte phirne ke hum nahi qaayal,
    jab aankh se hi na tapka to phir lahu kya hai?

    ReplyDelete
  6. who are you?! that's my favourite of Ghalib...

    ReplyDelete
  7. Who am I?

    har ek baat pe kahte ho tum ki 'tu kya hai'?
    tumheen kaho ki ye andaaz-e-guftgu kya hai?


    ;)

    A sliver of a thought may be - re "pensieve". :)

    ReplyDelete
  8. The "pensieve" brought me here, anyway. :)

    ReplyDelete
  9. A little "play" never hurts: DeliciƦ meƦ esse cum filiis hominum. (My delights are to be with the children of men.)

    But since there is little play... here. :)

    ReplyDelete
  10. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  11. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  12. :) no u haven't.. but then..

    I tried replying but it was as if there was some supernatural element which wouldn't allow me to post a reply..

    I was just wondering if you got here through a pensieve, I must have been simmering and lingering in some random memory or thought..I wouldn't know..

    What if THIS (here and now) were a pensieve too? heh..there'd be no end to this infinite regress.. :)

    Just sayin.

    ReplyDelete
  13. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  14. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  15. :P sometimes, the fun is in 'keeping' the ball. :)

    Old wives tales and true! Dont know if i subscribe to that! what do we talk about?

    ReplyDelete
  16. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  17. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  18. :) old wives tales are for the innocent. and I have been guilty of that one crime more than once :) and leap of faith can make even the earth go flat..so yea..

    Young pragmatist.. u nailed it.. in a way I am.. and i guess being a law student helps.:) But then, there is another realm and in that I live in negation of rules.

    We are all ontological contradictions.. i am sure to be one. :)

    ReplyDelete
  19. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  20. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  21. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  22. You're a master at abstraction. I read the prose..and also about it. Beautiful and poignant. :)

    ReplyDelete
  23. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  24. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  25. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  26. 'incest, 'grotesque', 'blood' intermittently spilling over your narrative and now 'terror'..howsoever beautifully interlaced..i see your drift..

    I guess I cannot keep pace with a masqueraded conversation.. i seek 'life' in words not mere 'citations' and subjective analogy :)

    ReplyDelete
  27. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete